法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 商標搶先註冊於商標法與公平交易法之規範(Trademark Unfair Registration under Regulations of Trademark Act and Fair Trade Act)
編著譯者: 楊文瑞
出版日期: 2005.05
刊登出處: 台灣/智慧財產權第 77 期 /71-83 頁
頁  數: 9 點閱次數: 982
下載點數: 36 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 楊文瑞
關 鍵 詞: 商標搶註不正競爭司法調查權襲用註冊
中文摘要: 商標搶先註冊可能同時構成商標不得註冊事由及違反公平交易法,同時樣態多變。當前實務擴大解釋商標法第二十三條第十四款(搶註條款)以試圖解決避免放縱此一不正競爭樣態。惟,因搶註事件可能另涉及實體關係導致商標主管機關擴大解釋並適用搶註條款將有違法理或將來與他機關產生判決歧異之虞,故不正競爭事件應交由具備司法調查權之公平交易委員專責依據公平交易法第二十四條處理。如此既能充分發揮防杜搶註功能亦不違法理,故不正競爭防止應寄望於公平交易法及公平交易委員會而非商標法及其主管機關,特予介紹析論之。
英文關鍵詞: trademark unfair registrationunfair competitionjudicial prosecutionquasi-judicial powerlikelihood to mislead
英文摘要: A trademark unfair registration is possible to constitute non-registration provision and unfair competition at the same time while it varies. The currently practice solve the problem by making the definition broader of the Trademark Act § 23(14) to try to avoid this sort of unfair competition. However, because, for the Intellectual Property Office, an unfair registration likely involves other substantial relationship resulting in the likelihood against the law by making the definition broader and applying it, unfair competition disputes should refer to the Fair Trade Commission with quasi-judicial power in accordance with the Fair Trade Act § 24. By this way, we can fully prevent unfair registration without violating the law theoretically, so we should look forward the Fair Trade Act and the Fair Trade Commission to settle the problem instead of the Trademark Act and Intellectual Property Office.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、搶註行為之實務決定
參、搶註條款之「其他關係」
一、搶註條款立法沿革
二、搶註條款之「其他關係」
肆、公平交易法第二十四條適用基準及比較
伍、司法調查權與處理搶註行為之重要性
一、比較美國商標爭議制度
二、解決方案及建議
陸、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列