法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
女性犯罪責任-以鄧如雯殺夫案為例(The Narrative Construction of the Female Criminal Responsibility: The Study on the Deng Ru-Wen Case)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 李佳玟
出版日期: 2005.11
刊登出處: 台灣/國立臺灣大學法學論叢第 34 卷 第 6 期/1-56 頁
頁  數: 56 點閱次數: 3672
下載點數: 224 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 國立臺灣大學法律學院
關 鍵 詞: 法律敘事分析法律與文學運動性別研究鄧如雯案家庭暴力受虐婦女症候群正當防衛主體性
中文摘要: 法律敘事分析屬於法律與文學研究流派的一支,近幾十年來在英美學界開始發展,並受到相當的重視。其理論預設在於,法律也是文本的一種,涉及修辭、表達、閱讀與解釋,因此研究文學作品的方法亦可用於法律研究,目的是從法律文本的修辭與結構,挖掘隱藏於法律條文與判決文字內的意識型態。受到高度囑目與爭論的法律審判,尤其適合用來檢視丈本、意識型態與法律之間的關係。本文以十年前震驚台灣社會的鄧如雯殺夫案為對象,分析各具意識型態的審判參與者,如何在法律所允許的空間裡,透過將相關事件組織成一個具有動機、因果始末與角色情節之敘事的方式,建構被告鄧如雯的刑事責任。透過對於鄧如雯刑事責任的建構,審判內的敘事不僅呼應、也同時參與了在當時社會中之性別意識型態的競爭。
英文關鍵詞: Legal Narrative AnalysisLaw and Literature MovementGender StudiesThe Deng Ru-Wen CaseDomestic ViolenceBattered Woman SyndromeSelf DefenseSubjectivity
英文摘要: Legal narrative analysis is part of the recent Law and Literature Movement. The theoretical assumption of this methodology is that law is also a kind of text. Its creation and apprehension equally require literary skills, such as rhetoric and interpretation. Therefore, the analysis techniques developed in literary critics can be similarly applied to the legal research, particularly if researchers are interested in the ideologies hidden in the allegedly neutral languages of law. Among legal texts, the high-profile trials, which prompt sensational news stories and agitate heated debates, are ideal sites to examine the interrelationship between text, ideology and the law. This article will use a famous trial in mid 1990s-the Deng Ru-Wen case, which Deng killed her outrageously abusive husband, to demonstrate that ideologies are tightly woven into the rhetoric and the structure of a legal narrative. Thus, when different narrators argue about what really happened in Deng's case, they do not just debate on her criminal responsibility; they also participate in the broader ideological debate about gender role in the society. Through analyzing narratives concerning Deng's criminal responsibility advocated inside/outside her trials, this paper intends to show that legal narratives are by no means neutral as claimed. Instead, they always endorse certain ideologies. When the defendants are ex-/inculpated, the ideologies the narrators embrace are consequently reinforced.
目  次: 壹、緒論
貳、法律敘事分析
參、鄧案審判中的敘事
一、敘事結構與法律責任的認定
二、實體法規則與審判敘事的製造與競爭
三、主體性的敘事建構:精神耗弱 v. 正當防衛
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
李佳玟,女性犯罪責任-以鄧如雯殺夫案為例,國立臺灣大學法學論叢,第 34 卷 第 6 期,1-56 頁,2005年11月。
返回功能列