法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
拍照攝影於偵查中搜索扣押程序之運用及其界限 ( The Use and Limitations of Photograph-Taking and Video-Recording in Search and Seizure Procedures in Criminal Investigation)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 吳秋宏
出版日期: 2008.04
刊登出處: 台灣/東吳法研論集第 4 卷/205-244 頁
頁  數: 24 點閱次數: 1500
下載點數: 96 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 吳秋宏
關 鍵 詞: 拍照攝影搜索扣押犯罪偵查容許性
中文摘要: 偵查人員於刑事犯罪偵查中執行搜索、扣押程序所為之拍照攝影,為偵查實務所常用。此種拍照攝影,有時係為證明執行程序之適法性,有時是基於保全扣押物之證據價值,有時則是對於應扣押物以外之物體外形、文書等內容進行拍攝。此種拍照攝影行為,在實定法上欠缺法律明文授權,本文首先將探討其性質及適法性。其次,受處分人不服檢察官所為涉及犯罪偵查之搜索、扣押處分,依法得提起準抗告,然而對於搜索、扣押程序中之拍照攝影或不服檢察事務官、司法警察(官)所為之相同處分,能否提起準抗告,乃次一重要課題。最後,本文將分析探究因前揭搜索、扣押程序取得之照片、錄影帶,在審判程序中能否成為適法之證據,並同時討論法院對於該等證據之調查方法。簡言之,本文之目的,係為釐清偵查人員在犯罪偵查程序執行搜索、扣押時所為拍照攝影之運用及其界限。
英文關鍵詞: PhotographyRecordingSearchSeizeCriminal InvestigationAdmissibility
英文摘要: When investigators execute search and seizure in criminal investigation, they usually take photographs and record videos for the following purposes: 1) proving legitimacy of search and seizure procedures; 2) perpetuating evidential value of seized property; and 3) photographing and recording the appearance and content of property which are not subject to seizure. Nevertheless, there is no legal basis for photograph-taking and video-recording in search and seizure procedures.
Firstly, this note will discuss the nature and legitimacy of photograph-taking and video-recording in search and seizure procedures. Secondly, a quasi-interlocutory appeal against the prosecutor,s measure regarding search and seizure may be filed. However, is it allowed to file a quasi-interlocutory appeal against the measure regarding search and seizure taken by prosecutor investigators and judicial police officers? Thirdly, this note will analyze whether photographs and videotapes taken in search and seizure procedures are admitted as evidence in trials and how courts investigate the above evidence. To sum up, this note is to clarify the use and limitations of investigators, photograph-taking and video- recording in search and seizure procedures in criminal investigation.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、拍照攝影之性質
一、法源依據
二、類型一
三、類型二
四、類型三
參、拍照攝影之救濟途徑
一、準抗告與勘驗
二、準抗告之對象
三、準抗告之範圍
四、本文立場
肆、拍照攝影所得照片、錄影帶之證據性質
一、搜索扣押筆錄之性質
二、搜索扣押筆錄所附照片錄影之證據性質
三、照片錄影之證據調查方法
伍、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
吳秋宏,拍照攝影於偵查中搜索扣押程序之運用及其界限,東吳法研論集,第 4 卷,205-244 頁,2008年04月。
返回功能列