法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
不能未遂之危險評價(Evaluation on the Danger of Attempt with Impossible Crime)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 余振華
出版日期: 2010.04
刊登出處: 台灣/法學叢刊第 55 卷 第 2 期/45-66 頁
頁  數: 22 點閱次數: 1870
下載點數: 88 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 余振華
關 鍵 詞: 不能未遂客觀危險具體危險說抽象危險說假設事實說
中文摘要: 以往,不能未遂係在與未遂犯處罰根據之關聯性上被提出來討論,因此造成客觀主義刑法理論與主觀主義刑法理論之激烈對立。不能未遂之危險性判斷,關鍵在於未遂犯之處罰根據。關於未遂犯之處罰根據,主觀未遂理論認為係行為人之危險,以行為人之惡劣性格為斷;客觀未遂理論則認為係行為之危險,以行為有無發生結果之危險為斷。依據我國現行刑法有關不能未遂之規定,基本上係採客觀未遂理論,而危險之內涵主要係指行為屬性之危險或結果之危險。本文係以此為出發點,再次探討不能未遂「危險性」判斷之學說論點,進而基於違法性本質論之觀點,確立危險性之判斷標準。
英文關鍵詞: attempt with impossible crimeobjective dangerousnessdoctrine of concrete dangerousnessdoctrine of abstract dangerousnessdoctrine of hypothetical dangerousness
英文摘要: In the past, the punishing relevance of attempt with impossible crime and attempted offence was brought up for discussion, and thus it resulted in fierce opposition between objectivism and subjectivism criminal law theory. The key judgment of the danger of attempt with impossible crime lies in the punishment of attempted offense. On the basis of the attempted offense, subjective theory believes the behavior of danger, the behavior of mean character; objective theory considers the danger of behavior, to occur as a result of the hazard. Pursuant to the existing criminal law relating to the provisions of the attempted offense, basically the objective attempted theory mainly refers to the behavior properties of the danger or that of the result. This article is thus to explore the theories of judging“ danger ”,which in turn is based on the argument of illegality of the essence, the judgment criterion of establishing the danger.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、不能未遂之理論基礎
參、客觀危險之犯罪論體系地位
肆、客觀危險性之判斷標準
伍、不能未遂之問題檢視
陸、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
余振華,不能未遂之危險評價,法學叢刊,第 55 卷 第 2 期,45-66 頁,2010年04月。
返回功能列