法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 論警告射擊之適法性
編著譯者: 陳景發
出版日期: 2010.10
刊登出處: 台灣/法學新論第 26 期 /81-103 頁
頁  數: 22 點閱次數: 1382
下載點數: 88 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 陳景發
關 鍵 詞: 事前警告警告射擊威嚇射擊對輪胎射擊
中文摘要: 警告射擊,或稱威嚇射擊,與直接對人射擊,雖均已發射子彈,然或因警告射擊僅係出於警告之目的,且在正常狀況下,並未對人造成危害,故成為爭訟焦點者不多,學說論述亦屬少見。由於警告射擊尚有諸多亟待釐清之處,例如警械使用條例在二○○二年修正並刪除有關事前警告之規定後,究竟警察在對人射擊前應否先為警告射擊?實施警告射擊時,於方法與時機上應受何種限制?以及實務上所常見之警察為阻止車輛逃逸而對該車輛輪胎射擊之情形,此種射擊方法應否納入警告射擊之範疇等等。因涉及用槍過法性問題並關涉人民生命身體之重大權利,頗值為文探究。
英文關鍵詞: Anticipative Warning (Pre-warning)Warning ShotThreatening ShotShot in Tire
英文摘要: Warning Shot, also called "Threatening Shot"; compared with shoot to a person directly , although both were firing a bullet out of the arms, but Warning Shot was no more then giving a warning for its purpose, and in a normal condition, it doesn't make any harmfulness to human being, therefore such appeal cases to Warning Shot became much less, the studying on discussing Warning Shot also has not often seen. The Warning Shot still have many indetermination parts. For example, after the Police Weapons Usage Act reformed and deleted the prescript of Pre-warning before shooting people in 2002, does a policeman need to do a Warning Shot before shoot somebody? Is there any restriction of the process or occasion, when conduct the Warning Shot? Also in reality we often saw some policemen who shot tire, when they tried to stop vehicle from escaping. According to that, should it also include a part of Warning Shot? and so on. Such questions concern about the legitimacy of using a fire-arms and the important rights of people's life. It is worthy to investigate such subject.
目  次: 壹、序說
貳、警告射擊之概念
參、警告射擊之方法與時機
肆、對行進車輛輪胎射擊,非警告射擊
伍、警告射擊後之警察應有做法
陸、警告射擊之適法性判斷根據與間卻違法事由
柒、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列