法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
論公同共有理論之架構(The Architecture Of The Theory Of Ownership-in-common In Civil Code)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 古振暉
出版日期: 2011.03
刊登出處: 台灣/財產法暨經濟法第 25 期/111-154 頁
頁  數: 29 點閱次數: 835
下載點數: 116 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 古振暉
關 鍵 詞: 共同所有所有權分別共有公同共有財產法
中文摘要: 每當論及有關共同所有之理論時,學者們總不自覺的將分別共有作為主要的範本,這是因為公同共有的條文在我國的規定不僅過於簡要,且流於破碎,無法為完整的說明。但公同共有不僅得適用於物權法,就連合夥、夫妻共同財產、共同繼承的情形均可適用,顯然公同共有並不侷限於受到物權法立法原則之拘束,而具有其獨立且完整的理論基礎。本文係以公同共有理論的架構作為主要?究之目的,並且,透過該文對於物權法交易秩序限制之說明,以瞭解為何物權法的核心將從所有權保護為中心的思想,漸往財產法建構的立法趨勢。
英文關鍵詞: co-ownershipownershipeach co-ownerownership-in-commonproperty law
英文摘要: When the people talks about the theory of co-ownership is always building the basis on the rule of each co-owner in Taiwan, because of the rule of ownership-in-common in Civil code is broken and fewer than the each co-owner's. However, the rule about co-dominant property of somepeople's relationship like partnership, the community of property is constituted by the husband and the wife and co-succesion also use the rule of ownership-in-common. Apparently, the rule of ownership-in-common has its own independent and integral theory architecture different from the rule of each co-owner. Therefore, the interesting question that the article aim to research arises is what The architecture of the theory of ownership-in-common in civel code. Besides, the research about remove the restriction on transaction order in civil law is help to understand why the property law's core from ownership to property.
目  次: 壹、所有權理論與共同所有理論之關係
一、近代所有權的構成
二、近代所有權理論對於共同所有關係的影響
三、近代所有權理論適用共同所有關係的缺漏與調整
四、公同共有意義與近代所有權理論間的矛盾
貳、物權體系與公同共有之理論
一、以財產權為主的經濟交易秩序與現實支配的物權保障體系
二、公同共有傳統學說之檢討
三、小結
參、公同共有理論的架構分析
一、共同財產的構成與範圍
二、歸屬
三、持分
四、權利變動
五、權利之保護
六、解散
肆、公同共有與分別共有的比較
伍、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
古振暉,論公同共有理論之架構,財產法暨經濟法,第 25 期,111-154 頁,2011年03月。
返回功能列