法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
大陸刑事訴訟法單獨宣告沒收制度的檢討-兼論對兩岸刑事司法互助的影響(The Exploration of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Mainland China and Its Implication to the Cross-Strait Criminal Mutual Legal Assistance)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 吳天雲
出版日期: 2013.01
刊登出處: 台灣/法學叢刊第 58 卷 第 1 期/163-193 頁
頁  數: 31 點閱次數: 910
下載點數: 124 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 吳天雲
關 鍵 詞: 沒收單獨宣告沒收正當法律程序刑事司法互助反腐敗公約
中文摘要: 大陸鑑於貪污犯罪行為人攜款外逃的情況日益嚴重,故參考聯合國反腐敗公約與美國民事沒收制度,於其刑事訴訟法內新增逃匿、死亡犯罪行為人的單獨宣告沒收制度,期望藉由刑事司法互助向外國沒收、返還貪污等犯罪行為人的犯罪所得而預防犯罪行為。然而,此種制度並非可以任意為之,本文從正當法律程序原則的觀點檢討大陸刑事訴訟法的相關內容,並探究未來對於兩岸刑事司法互助的影響。
英文關鍵詞: Forfeiturenon-conviction based asset forfeituredue processmutual legal assistanceUnited Nations Convention against Corruption
英文摘要: In view of the worsening situation of fugitive with huge corrupting money, Mainland China adds the system of non-conviction based asset forfeiture regarding the escape and death penalty criminal into its Code of Criminal Procedure with reference to United Nations Convention against Corruption and the United States system of civil forfeiture, facilitating to request the foreign jurisdiction for confiscating and returning the proceeds of crimes by mutual legal assistance, so as to prevent the criminal behavior. However, the said system is not easy to carry out. This article will explore the related content of Mainland China’s Code of Criminal Procedure in view of due process of law and its implication to the cross-strait criminal mutual legal assistance.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、背景與內容
參、比較與檢討
肆、對兩岸刑事司法互助的影響
伍、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
吳天雲,大陸刑事訴訟法單獨宣告沒收制度的檢討-兼論對兩岸刑事司法互助的影響,法學叢刊,第 58 卷 第 1 期,163-193 頁,2013年01月。
返回功能列