法學期刊
論著名稱: 從行政罰之本質探討通知違約廠商刊登政府採購公報之性質(A Study on the Property of the Suppliers Whose Name Has Been Published on the Government Procurement Gazette from the Character of Administrative Sanction)
編著譯者: 洪家殷
出版日期: 2014.10
刊登出處: 台灣/法學叢刊第 59 卷 第 4 期 /37-62 頁
頁  數: 26 點閱次數: 1886
下載點數: 104 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 法學叢刊雜誌社
關 鍵 詞: 政府採購法停權制度行政罰之意義管制處分
中文摘要: 我國政府採購法之立法目的,在於建立政府採購制度,並維持公平之採購秩序。倘有破壞採購秩序之行為者,該法除定有罰責規定外,另於第 101 條至第 103 條中,建立將違約廠商刊登政府採購公報予以停權之制度。對於此種發生停權效果之行為,其性質為何?於該法施行後即一直存有相當之爭議。本文將從行政罰之本質出發,探討此種通知廠商刊登政府公報行為之性質。首先,說明此制度之背景及立法理由。再以早期實務見解中,100 年度高等行政法院法律座談會提案第 3 號為中心,說明不同意見之理由,以及文獻之看法。再者,將針對最高行政法院 101 年度 6 月份第 1 次庭長法官聯席會議決議,歸納各說之理由,以及決議文之內容,並闡述學者之意見及對本決議文之檢討。其次,將建立判斷行政罰之標準,即從行政罰之本質意義中,提出八項特徵,再就系爭各款事由,分別檢討是否得認定屬行政罰。期藉由此種理論上之探討,能對此由來以久之爭議,發揮釐清之效果。
英文關鍵詞: The Government Procurement Actrights suspensionthe character of administrative sanctionregulate administrative decision
英文摘要: The Government Procurement Act is enacted to establish a government procurement system that has fair and open procedure. If there is anyone who violates the order of government procurement system, this Act not only has Penalty for it but enact the “rights suspension”, which means the supplier will be prohibited from participating in tendering, or being awarded or sub-contracted within the certain periods, in article 101-103. However, the property of the rights suspension is debatable since this Act has enforced. This thesis reviewed the property of the rights suspension on the character of administrative sanction. Firstly, we review the background, legislative purposes, literature and different opinions on No. 3 case on a law seminar in 2011 held by High Administrative Courts. Secondly, we interpreted and concluded the opinions of the Joint Meeting in 2013 held by Supreme Administration Court and other scholastic opinions. We expected to establish the standards apply to contents of the Articles103 to review whether the administrative sanction is, to clarify this long-period debate by our effort.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、政府通知違約廠商刊登公報之背景及立法理由
參、最高行政法院 101 年度 6 月份第 1 次庭長法官聯席會議決議作成前之實務見解
肆、最高行政法院 101 年度 6 月份第 1 次庭長法官聯席會議決議
伍、學者之見解
陸、行政罰判斷之標準
柒、政府採購法第 101 條第 1 項各款之判斷
捌、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
    返回功能列