法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
敘事與正義的地方性知識-臺灣人法意識與法律空間的民族誌
文獻引用
編著譯者: 王曉丹
出版日期: 2016.01.05
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 249 期/5-19 頁
頁  數: 14 點閱次數: 920
下載點數: 56 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 王曉丹
關 鍵 詞: 敘事正義法意識法律空間地方性知識
中文摘要: 法律或權利跨越空間(space),於在地(place)的月常生活產:生何種社會作用?本文採取法文化「深層描繪」(deep description)的詮釋性研究本文發現,權利意識在既有的「法律感知」(legal sensibility)下,造成人際互動中是否為「自己人」的劃界與排除行勳。本文詮釋此種法律感知」深層法文化,包括人我難分、虛實交錯的法意識(簡化法律、裝扮法律、聲稱法律),以及雞同鴨講、難以整合的法律空間。而這從人觀(personhood)的角度來說,可以解釋華人文化從傳統慣習主導,走向人我交換的社會過程。
英文關鍵詞: NarrativeJusticeLegal ConsciousnessLegal SpaceLocal Knowledge
英文摘要: This article applies an ethnographic approach, using "deep description", to analyze one case in Taiwan arid explain the act of imagining the real, or what Geertz called "legal sensibility". It finds that m situations of conflict, the process or story-telling is a constant struggle between facts and norms. The deep logic behind this. is the identification that divides people into those who are "one of us" and those who are not. Specifically, the demarcation of "one of us" influences how we imagine the real, and reflects a specific narrative and view of justice. this article develops two ways to analyze the "one of us". narrative and justice. First, three typologies or legal consciousness render it difficult to distinguish oneself from others and blurs the lines between the true and the raise. Second, legal space of "talks without communication" makes it difficult to adjust the law. This article concludes a particular view of personhood: people are constantly demarcating lines between themselves and others. Relationships within "one of us" become formalized and outside "one of us" generate pains that may become resources for future change.
目  次: 壹、前言:少年 Pi 的兩個故事版本
貳、故事的外在矛盾
參、「人我難分而虛實交錯」:簡化、裝扮與聲稱法律的法意識
肆、「彼此對立而雞同鴨講」:欠缺整合、調整與可能性的法律空間
伍、人觀(personhood)與正義
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
王曉丹,敘事與正義的地方性知識-臺灣人法意識與法律空間的民族誌,月旦法學雜誌,第 249 期,5-19 頁,2016年01月05日。
返回功能列