法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
勞動三法修正後罷工規範之研究(The Norm of Strikes after the Amendment of Three Labor Laws)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 劉士豪
出版日期: 2016.04
刊登出處: 台灣/國立中正大學法學集刊第 51 期/133-181 頁
頁  數: 49 點閱次數: 3578
下載點數: 196 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 中正大學法律學系 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 罷工勞動三法勞資爭議處理法調整事項勞資爭議不當勞動行為主體正當性目的正當性程序正當性手段正當性
中文摘要: 本文除序言和結論外,主要內容分為兩大部分:一是勞資爭議與勞資爭議行為的類型與關聯,第二個部分在討論罷工合法性要件及其法律效果。
首先討論勞資爭議與爭議行為之關聯,勞資爭議之類型分為兩種:權利事項之勞資爭議及調整事項之勞資爭議,而權利事項中又分為一般權利事項及涉及不當勞動行為之權利事項,調整事項之勞資爭議及涉及不當勞動行為之權利事項的勞資爭議得進行罷工。其次介紹爭議行為的重要類型。
罷工合法性要件有四:主體正當性、目的正當性、程序正當性及手段正當性。符合四個正當性的罷工在刑法、行政法及民法均有阻卻違法事由,故為合法之行為,免除非法之責任。
英文關鍵詞: StrikesThree Labor LawsLabor Dispute Settlement LawConflict of InterestLabor DisputesUnfair Labor Practicesthe Legitimacy of the Organizationthe Legitimacy of the Purposethe Legitimacy of the Processthe Legitimacy of the Means
英文摘要: The purpose of this research is to provide an overall review of the new norm of strikes in Taiwan. Industrial actions must be based on labor disputes. Labor disputes are essential integral and undivided parts of collective bargaining. Labor disputes often may be accompanied industrial actions. The state must remain neutral in labor relations. If there are not industrial actions to formation of pressure, then both parts of labor relation, either employers or trade unions, may be free to refuse to negotiate. The labor market would lose the collective bargaining system. Strike is the typical and most important industrial action. Since the Amendment of three labor laws, i.e. the Trade Union Law, the Collective Agreement Law, the Settlement of Labor Disputes Law, in 2008-2010 and implement in 2011 which format a new norm of strikes in Taiwan.
In addition to the introductory and concluding remark, this paper is divided into three sections. Section one describes mainly the types of labor disputes and the relations between the industrial Actions. Section two discusses the four conditions of legitimate Strike, such as 1. Legitimate subject, 2. Legitimate purpose, 3. Legitimate procedure and 4. Legitimate means. Section three explains several legal effects of legitimate strike and illegitimate strike. The Approach of this discuss is not only with labor Law, but also with penal law, civil law and administrative law in Taiwan.
目  次: 壹、序言
貳、勞資爭議與爭議行為之關聯
一、勞資爭議行為的類型
二、爭議行為的定義與類型
(一)爭議行為的主觀要件
與客觀要件
(二)爭議行為的重要類型
參、罷工之合法性要件
一、主體正當性
(一)工會領導
(二)特殊勞工限制
二、目的正當性
(一)針對調整事項之勞資
爭議
(二)針對不當勞動行為之
勞資爭議
三、程序正當性
(一)需經調解
(二)需經會員投票
(三)特殊期間之限制
(四)特殊行業之限制
(五)安全衛生限制
四、手段正當性
五、爭議行為的免責規範及
保護
(一)刑事免責
(二)行政罰免責
(三)民事免責
(四)不利益待遇之保護
肆、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
劉士豪,勞動三法修正後罷工規範之研究,國立中正大學法學集刊,第 51 期,133-181 頁,2016年04月。
返回功能列