法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
賄賂罪與國會議員的職務權限-日本最高裁判所平成20年3月27日判決解說與借鏡(The Offence of Bribery and the Official Authorities of Members of Congress-Explanation of the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Japan on Mar 27, 2008, and the Aspects Can Be Learned From)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 吳天雲
出版日期: 2016.07
刊登出處: 台灣/法學叢刊第 61 卷 第 3 期/73-98 頁
頁  數: 26 點閱次數: 1032
下載點數: 104 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 吳天雲
關 鍵 詞: 貪污賄賂職務上行為實質影響力
中文摘要: 國會議員基於憲法與其他法律而具有各種權限,乃至於遊說、接受陳情等各種行為,惟國會議員行為在何種範圍內始屬於賄賂罪成立要件之職務上行為?能否援用源自日本職務密切關係行為概念的實質影響力說?近時成為學說與實務爭議之焦點。對此,本文介紹日本最高裁判所平成 20 年 3 月 27 日判決之事實、判決解說與日本學說之評論,以供未來我國之參考。

英文關鍵詞: CorruptionBriberyOfficial ActSubstance Influence
英文摘要: Members of congress or parliament possess various authorities conferred by the constitutions and other domestic laws, including conducts of lobbying, dealing with people’s appeals or statements, etc. But the issues of to what extent do we consider a member of congress’ conduct as being in connection with his/her duties, which is one of the main elements in constituting the crime of bribery, and would it be appropriate to invoke the theory of substance influence from Japan, which is based on the concept of conducts being in close connection with his/her duties, are both remain in dispute among legal doctrines and practical operation. In this regard, the article below is about to introduce the judgment of the Supreme Court of Japan on Mar 3, 2008, and to analyze the details of the case, the different aspects of the verdict, and the academic comments on it for our future reference.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、本案事實與解說
參、檢討與借鏡
肆、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
吳天雲,賄賂罪與國會議員的職務權限-日本最高裁判所平成20年3月27日判決解說與借鏡,法學叢刊,第 61 卷 第 3 期,73-98 頁,2016年07月。
返回功能列