法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
臺灣法院涉外商事案件承認與執行之評析(A Study on Recognition and Enforcement of Commercial Cases Involving Foreign Elements in Taiwan Court)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 吳盈德
出版日期: 2017.06
刊登出處: 台灣/中華國際法與超國界法評論第 13 卷 第 1 期/151-171 頁
頁  數: 21 點閱次數: 2133
下載點數: 84 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 吳盈德
關 鍵 詞: 涉外商事案件判決承認與執行民事訴訟法第 402 條必翔案嘉德案
中文摘要: 外國法院判決的承認與執行,是指一國法院依據一定的法律程序,針對外國法院所為之涉外商事案件判決,承認其在本國境內所具有之法律效力並予以本國境內之強制執行。且現今國際間商務頻繁,私法法律關係交流日益增加,法院判決的國際效力對於國際間商務的活動,具有促進與保障的功能。因此,外國法院判決承認與執行之問題,成為國際私法理論和實踐中,解決的一個重要問題。本論文以必翔與嘉德兩案件為例,深入分析臺灣法院對於涉外商事案件承認與執行之態度。
本論文將就上述兩案,就己見淺略評析判決之內容。最後,以我國法制規定的綜合討論及要件評析作為本論文之結論。
英文關鍵詞: Commercial Cases Involving Foreign ElementsRecognition and Enforcement of JudgmentTaiwan Code of Civil Procedure Article 402Pihsiang CaseGuardian Case
英文摘要: The recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment refers to the court of one nation acting in accordance with a foreign regulative legal procedure, exercising domestic legal force and domestic compulsory execution under the terms of the judgment of a foreign court on a related but foreign commercial case. Currently, such action functions to accelerate and ensure international business activities based on the international force of the judgment of the court, as the role of private law is increasing daily due to the frequency of international business. Therefore, this has become a critical issue to be solved with respect to the theory and practice of private international law on the topic of the recognition and enforcement of the judgment of a foreign court. The article took two cases from the Pihsiang and Guardian as examples to do a thorough analysis of the attitude toward recognition and enforcement on the part of the court of Taiwan toward the commercial cases involving foreign elements.
The article analyzed the contents of judgments within the said cases according to the author’s point of view. In the end, the concept of regulatory requirements will be explained as the conclusion.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、承認與執行的關係
  一、由比較法上觀察外國法院判決執行之要件
  二、我國現行的法規範
參、必翔與嘉德案
  一、臺灣最高法院一○○年度台上字第二二四二號判決(必翔案)
  二、臺灣最高法院台上字第一○一○號民事裁定(嘉德案)
肆、結論
  一、依中華民國之法律,外國法院無管轄權者
  二、敗訴之被告未應訴者。但開始訴訟之通知或命令已於相當時期在該國合法送達,或依中華民國法律上之協助送達者,不在此限
  三、判決之內容或訴訟程序,有背中華民國之公共秩序或善良風俗者
  四、無相互之承認者
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
吳盈德,臺灣法院涉外商事案件承認與執行之評析,中華國際法與超國界法評論,第 13 卷 第 1 期,151-171 頁,2017年06月。
返回功能列