法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
國際刑事司法互助之雙方可罰性原則規範模式分析-併論其於洗錢防制之規範模式(Analyzing the Regulating Model of the Principle of Dual Criminality in the International Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters-and the Regulating Model thereof in Money Laundering Prevention)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 黃謀信
出版日期: 2018.05
刊登出處: 台灣/法令月刊第 69 卷 第 5 期/75-93 頁
頁  數: 17 點閱次數: 692
下載點數: 68 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 黃謀信
關 鍵 詞: 雙方可罰原則FATF40 項建議刑事司法互助洗錢防制法引渡
中文摘要: 過於僵化之雙方可罰原則,對刑事司法互助之廣泛運用顯然有礙,故近年來之國際公約、條約、司法互助協定及各國內國法對雙方可罰原則,大都採取緩解或放棄適用之趨勢,以調和雙方可罰原則與活絡刑事司法互助之關係。在刑事司法互助之具體實踐上,其緩解或放棄適用雙方可罰原則之規範模式,卻極為分歧。我國相關之法律、條約、刑事司法互助協定及洗錢防制法關於「雙方可罰原則」之規範模式與「40 項建議」等國際公約之規範模式是否相符?值得予以歸類分析,可供我國實務適用上產生疑義及未來修法時之參考。
英文關鍵詞: Dual CriminalityFATF40 RecommendationsMutual Legal AssistanceMoney Laundering Control ActExtradition
英文摘要: The principle of dual criminality narrows the use of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters when it is applied without any flexibility. As a result, there is a trend to apply the principle more loosely or to refrain from the application of the principle altogether in the international conventions, treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements and domestic laws in recent years so as to coordinate the relation between the application of the principle and the encouragement of the broader use of mutual legal assistance. With regard to the mutual legal assistance in criminal matters in practice, in order to loosening up the application of the dual criminality principle, different methods including excluding the application of the principle or to substitute with the abstract dual criminality principle to narrow the application of the principle of dual criminality, ruling out the application of the principle in whole or in part by the requested country are adopted in the international conventions, treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements and domestic laws. However, how to loosely apply or cease the application of the principle is quite diversified with regard to the implementation of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters.
Is the regulation of the principle of dual criminality in the relevant laws, treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements and the Money Laundering Control Act in Taiwan in conformity with the regulation of international conventions including the FATF 40 Recommendations? It is worthwhile to categorize and analyze the regulation thereof so as to provide as reference for future application and amendment.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、「雙方可罰原則」之具體構成內容
 一、雙方可罰行為之「可罰性」
 二、「適格要件」或「障礙事由」
 三、「法律效果」之規範態樣
參、我國關於雙方可罰原則之規範模式
 一、引渡法之規範模式
 二、「國際刑事司法互助法」之規範模式
 三、引渡條約之規範模式
 四、刑事司法互助協定之規範模式
肆、洗錢防制關於雙方可罰原則之規範模式
 一、「40 項建議」之規範模式
 二、我國洗錢防制法之規範模式
 三、洗錢防制規範模式之差異
伍、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
黃謀信,國際刑事司法互助之雙方可罰性原則規範模式分析-併論其於洗錢防制之規範模式,法令月刊,第 69 卷 第 5 期,75-93 頁,2018年05月。
返回功能列