法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
寫在金門博奕公投之後-離島建設條例觀光賭場條款回顧與展望(After Kinmen Gambling Referendum-rticle 10-2 of Offshore Islands Development Act in Retrospect and Prospect)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 羅承宗
出版日期: 2018.06
刊登出處: 台灣/科技法律評析第 10 期/97-127 頁
頁  數: 31 點閱次數: 789
下載點數: 124 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 國立高雄科技大學科技法律研究所 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 離島建設觀光賭場博奕公投地方自治
中文摘要: 2017 年 10 月 28 日,金門博弈公投結果揭曉,反賭方取得壓倒性勝利,更有公民團體提出「廢除離島建設條例第 10 條之 2,讓離島永遠脫離博弈公投威脅」的呼聲。按離島建設條例觀光賭場條款施行近 9 年來,掀起不少對立與爭辯。從公投結果來看,即便 2012 年 7 月馬祖博奕公投的投票結果為同意,但時至今日,於馬祖開設觀光賭場,在法律上依然是一場空談,也連帶暴露相關博奕法制一直欠缺整合的窘困。以前述失敗的金門博奕公投為契機,本文爰就我國觀光賭場的政策倡議與法案形成進行整體的梳理與分析,以求釐清箇中癥結,並進而對今後離島建設條例觀光賭場條款乃至賭場專法,應否賡續推動等相關法政策問題,提供具體看法。
英文關鍵詞: Offshore Islands DevelopmentGambling ReferendumLocal Self-Government
英文摘要: On October 28, 2017, the result of the Kinmen Gambling Referendum was announced. The anti-gambling party achieved an overwhelming victory. A group of citizens raised the appealof “Repeal the Article 10-2 of Offshore Islands Development Act,leave the island out of the game forever.” Since the Offshore Islands Development Act for nearly 9 years, many disputes and arguments have emerged. Judging from the results of the referendum, even though the voting result of the Mazu Gambling Referendum was agreed in July 2012, it’s still buncombe to run anysightseeing casino in Mazu, it shows the plight of related laws and regulations disarranging. With the aforementioned unsuccessful referendum of Kinmen as an opportunity, this article would reviews and analyzes the overall policy initiatives and bills formation of tourism casinos to clarify the crux of the problem, in addition to provide specific views on the policy of whether the Offshore Islands Development Act even the special law of sightseeing casinoshould move forward or not.
目  次: 壹、問題提出
貳、立法軌跡:「以賭興鄉」行不行?
一、2008 年前相關提案
二、2008 年 5 月後立法軌跡
參、博奕公投的舉辦與賭場管理專法的難航
一、博奕公投與其舉辦情形
二、難航的賭場管理專法
肆、晚近立法動態與法政策抉擇
一、晚近立法動態
二、解決路徑與法政策抉擇分析
伍、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
羅承宗,寫在金門博奕公投之後-離島建設條例觀光賭場條款回顧與展望,科技法律評析,第 10 期,97-127 頁,2018年06月。
返回功能列