法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
司法、考試與監察體制之改革與存廢:以民間新憲草案及第 8 屆國會相關提案為中心(The constitutional reforms relating to The Judicial、 Examination & Control Yuan of Taiwan (R.O.C.) (2007-2016))
文獻引用
編著譯者: 羅承宗
出版日期: 2018.02
刊登出處: 台灣/開南法學第 10 期/85-110 頁
頁  數: 15 點閱次數: 834
下載點數: 60 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 羅承宗
關 鍵 詞: 考試院監察院司法院龍的憲法憲政改革
中文摘要: 有關考試院、監察院存廢,以及司法院定位問題,素來為台灣法政學界爭訟盈庭的課題。現行「龍的憲法」不符憲政原理、破綻之處甚多。誠如學者分析,有關「五權憲法」、「萬能政府」的制度設計的良窳,以今日眼光來看,除若干意識型態問題不考慮外,學者認為其實已經判若分明。承此脈絡,本文將先從 2007 年新憲工作室版、2011 年新台灣國策版與 2014 年台教會版等三個近年民間團體公布的新憲法草案裡相關設計進行鳥瞰式考察,並進而就第 8 屆立法院相關修憲提案為中心展開評述。倘若下一波的憲改風潮可望再起,期待本文的相關研究,能為台灣憲政改革貢獻些許微薄助力。
英文關鍵詞: Examination YuanControl YuanJudicial YuanDragon's Constitutionconstitutional reform
英文摘要: The issue of the abolition of the Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan, and the positioning of Judicial Yuan have always been the mainly disputes between Taiwan's legal and political academia. Currently, this so-called "Dragon's Constitution" does not conform to constitutional principles and has so much flaws, either. As so much scholars analyzes, the advantages and disadvantages about the system design of "Five-Power Constitution" and "Big Government", apart from ideology issues, the present perspectives and scholars' studies show that it is clearly defined. In this vein, this article is aimed to the relevant draft constitution reports which published by the three civil society groups with bird's-eye view, including the 2007 edition of New Constitution Workshop, the 2011 edition of Taiwan Brain Trust (TBT) and the 2014 edition of Taiwan Association of University Professors. Furthermore, those articles on the amendments from the 8th Legislative Yuan duration are also an important part of this article. If the next generation's constitutional reform is expected to resume, I hope that the relevant research of this article could offer a little contribution to Taiwan's constitutional reform.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、三個民間版新憲草案的異同比較
一、2007 年新憲工作室版
二、2011 年新台灣國策智庫版
三、2014 年台教會版
四、歸納與分析
參、現行憲法的破綻
一、司法猶如多頭馬車
二、考試院割裂人事行政權
三、監察淪為政爭工具
肆、廢除考監 v.s. 員額下修:第 8 屆國會相關修憲提案鳥瞰
一、廢除考試院、監察院
二、司法院大法官、考試委員、監察委員員額下修
三、分析與評述
伍、從「臺灣苗栗化危機」看考、監兩院存廢爭議-代結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
羅承宗,司法、考試與監察體制之改革與存廢:以民間新憲草案及第 8 屆國會相關提案為中心,開南法學,第 10 期,85-110 頁,2018年02月。
返回功能列