法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
賄賂罪違背職務之判斷標準與斡旋收賄罪的具體適用-日本最高裁判所平成 15 年 1 月 14 日判決解說與借鏡(The Judgement Methods of Undue Advantage in Bribery Crime and Criminal Forfeiture: the Resolution of the Judgement of the Supreme Court of Japan on October 15, 2012, and the Aspects Can be Learned from)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 吳天雲
出版日期: 2020.07
刊登出處: 台灣/法學叢刊第 65 卷 第 3 期/93-121 頁
頁  數: 28 點閱次數: 845
下載點數: 112 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 法學叢刊雜誌社
關 鍵 詞: 貪污賄賂職務上行為違背職務斡旋收賄罪
中文摘要: 為了解決民意代表關說收賄是否屬於賄賂罪職務上行為之爭議,近時學說建議參考日本刑法制定斡旋收賄罪。此外,對於枉法收賄罪違背職務之行為的判斷標準,我國學說與實務見解亦不一致。對此,本文介紹涉及前述二個問題之日本最高裁判所平成 15 年 1 月 14 日判決之事實、判決解說與日本學說之評論,以供未來之參考。
英文關鍵詞: CorruptionBriberyOfficial ActAct Illegally or Refrain from Acting in the Exercise of Official DutyAcceptance for Exertion of Influence
英文摘要: Under the rule of law principle, people’s awareness of the content of the administration disposition is a very important procedural fundamental right, which must be realized by the legislative authority through the enactment of proper statutes in accordance with due process. (see J. Y. Interpretation No. 663, 667) When the legislators formed the Administrative Procedure Act, the provision of delivering or issuing was different from the Article 8 of the German Administrative Official Delivery Act, which clearly stipulates the cure clause. The Administrative Procedure Act has no provision for presumption of rightful delivering or cure the defect. Instead, the official delivery in the Code of Civil Procedure was transferred into the administrative procedures, which means at the processing of the legislation, the delivery of administration disposition was intentional strictly regulated. From the point of view of Important Theory, this article stands that the result of defect delivery should be retained by law and the administrative court should not create exceptions aside from law.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、本案事實與解說
參、檢討與借鏡
肆、非主管監督圖利罪取代斡旋收賄罪之初探
伍、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
吳天雲,賄賂罪違背職務之判斷標準與斡旋收賄罪的具體適用-日本最高裁判所平成 15 年 1 月 14 日判決解說與借鏡,法學叢刊,第 65 卷 第 3 期,93-121 頁,2020年07月。
返回功能列