法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 有機紫錐菊不同乾燥製程之活性成分差異研究(Study on the Difference of Active Ingredients of Organic E. Purpurea(Li.)Moench in Different Drying Processes)
編著譯者: 郭彩虹林文宏邱文正
出版日期: 2022.04
刊登出處: 台灣/生物產業科技管理叢刊第 10 卷 /13-25 頁
頁  數: 13 點閱次數: 13
下載點數: 52 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 財團法人全球生物產業科技發展基金會 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 紫錐菊乾燥製程活性成分菊苣酸
中文摘要: 本研究以有機紫錐菊(E. purpurea (Li.) Moench)花部為素材,以不同乾燥之製程,分別以冷凍乾燥與熱風乾燥之整朵花部,分析其活性成分之差異研究。結果顯示,冷凍乾燥優於熱風乾燥製程,其成分中的總酚(total phenols)差異達 26.11%;多醣(crude polysaccharide)差異達 10.00%;烷醯胺 8/9(Alkamide 8/9)差異達 130.61%;總咖啡酸衍生物(total caffeic acid derivatives)差異達 39.87%,其中總咖啡酸衍生物的咖啡醯酒石酸(caftaric acid)差異達 49.86%、綠原酸(chlorogenic acid)差異達 33.38%、洋薊酸(cynarin)差異達 0.97%、松果菊(echinacoside)差異達 7.02%、菊苣酸(cichoric acid)差異達 38.62%;但咖啡酸(caffeic acid)熱風乾燥優於冷凍乾燥製程差異達 14.19%。研究結論說明,冷凍乾燥相較熱風乾燥製程之成分產出,其活性較為優越,是為保留較佳活性成份之乾燥製程,以此研究之提出,做為紫錐菊原料處理與產品開發之參考。
英文關鍵詞: E. purpurea (Li.) MoenchDrying processActive ingredientcichoric acid
英文摘要: In this study, the flower parts of organic E. purpurea (Li.) Moench were used as materials, and the whole petals were dried by freeze drying and hot-air drying. The purpose is to analyze its active ingredients.
The results show that freeze drying is better than hot-air drying. The total phenols in its ingredients differ by 26.11%; the crude polysaccharide differs by 10.00%; the Alkamide 8/9 differs by 130.61%; total caffeic acid derivatives difference reached 39.87%, of which total caffeic acid derivatives difference of caftaric acid was 49.86%, chlorogenic acid difference was 33.38%, The difference in cynarin was 0.97%, the difference in echinacoside was 7.02%, and the difference in cichoric acid was 38.62%.But in terms of caffeic acid, hot-air drying is better than freeze-drying process, the difference is up to 14.19%. The conclusion shows that freeze drying has superior compared with hot-air drying process, which is a better process strategy. The purpose of this study is to serve as a reference for the treatment of E. purpurea (Li.) Moench petals.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、材料與研究方法
 一、試驗材料
 二、品質分析
  (一)總酚(Chen, Y. L. et al., 2015)
  (二)咖啡酸衍生物(Chen, Y. L. et al., 2015)
  (三)烷醯胺 8/9(Chen, Y. L. et al., 2015)
  (四)多醣(Dubois, M. et al., 1956; Mau, J. L. et al., 2019)
參、 研究結果
 一、紫錐菊不同乾燥製成之活性成份分析
 二、紫錐菊不同乾燥製成之活性成份差異比較分析
肆、結論與建議
 一、 結論
 二、 建議
相關法條:
    相關判解:
      相關函釋:
        相關論著:
          返回功能列