法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
論商品製造人責任中服務欠缺安全性在概念上之研析-最高法院 110 年度台上字第 1425 號判決與最高法院 105 年度台上字第 1905 號判決(Manufacturer of Goods in Service Lacking Safety Focusing on Civil Judgement of Taiwan Supreme Court (110) No. 1425 and (105) No. 1905)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 蔡晶瑩
出版日期: 2023.05
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 336 期/36-46 頁
頁  數: 11 點閱次數: 696
下載點數: 44 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 蔡晶瑩
關 鍵 詞: 服務之定義服務欠缺安全性無過失責任主義營業場地之安全性商品製造人責任
中文摘要: 我國消費者保護法第 7 條至第 10 條規定商品製造人責任,保護之內容包含商品與服務之安全性,並為了減輕消費者之舉證上負擔,採無過失責任主義,然而對於「服務」並未在法條上給予明確定義,造成法規適用之困難。因此學者分別提出其對於「服務」概念之見解,定義上可區分為廣義說與限制說,由於廣義說對於服務完全未予設限之結果,無形中擴張了消費者保護法中商品製造人責任規定之適用範圍,限制說則是限縮服務之適用範圍,在結果上較為合理。實務裁判中通常未給予服務直接之定義,而係依案件事實之具體情形,判斷企業經營者所提供之服務是否欠缺安全性,使得服務之概念依然具有討論之空間。
英文關鍵詞: Definition of ServiceService Lacking SafetyStrict LiabilitySafety of PremisesResponsibility of Manufacturer of Good
英文摘要: The responsibility of the manufacturer of goods includes the safety of goods and services. In order to reduce the burden of proof on consumers, the Consumer Protection Act adopts strict liability. However, there is no clear definition of "service" in the law, which makes it difficult to apply the law. Scholars have different views on the concept of "service", including the "broad interpretation" and the "limited interpretation". The application of the "broad interpretation" has invariably expanded the scope of responsibility of the manufacturer of goods in the Consumer Protection Law, while the "limited interpretation" seems to be more reasonable in limiting the scope of services. Rather, the Judgements usually determine whether the services provided by the entrepreneur are unsafe or not through the specific circumstances of the case, leaving room for discussion of the concept of service.
目  次: 壹、問題意識
貳、服務欠缺安全性在概念與範圍上之探討
參、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
蔡晶瑩,論商品製造人責任中服務欠缺安全性在概念上之研析-最高法院 110 年度台上字第 1425 號判決與最高法院 105 年度台上字第 1905 號判決,月旦法學雜誌,第 336 期,36-46 頁,2023年05月。
返回功能列