法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
疫苗施打不良反應的責任歸屬(下)(Accountability for Vaccine Adverse Reaction)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 張麗卿
出版日期: 2023.05
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 336 期/107-118 頁
頁  數: 13 點閱次數: 561
下載點數: 52 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 張麗卿
關 鍵 詞: 新冠肺炎(COVID-19)施打疫苗因果關係受害補償刑事責任
中文摘要: 施打疫苗是對抗新冠肺炎的主要措施。施打疫苗所引發的法律問題不少,值得注意。有人基於各種信念拒絕施打疫苗,但由於工作關係必須頻繁接觸人群,工作單位能否強制其施打?施打疫苗之後,引發不少死亡或傷重的狀況,因果關係應該如何評價?這涉及刑責與補償的適用。有些因果關係的評價爭議更大,例如,超出劑量施打、受施打者具有危險體質卻又要求醫護人員施打、混打疫苗,等等而引發不良反應,應該如何適當的評價?本文針對這些問題逐一的討論與回答。
英文關鍵詞: COVID-19VaccinationCausationCompensationCriminal Responsibility
英文摘要: Vaccination is a primary measure in the fight against COVID-19. A number of legal issues arise from vaccination are noteworthy. Can an employer mandates vaccination for people who must be in frequent contact with crowds at work, but refuse to be vaccinated because of various beliefs? How should the causation be determined in the cases of deaths or serious injuries caused by the vaccination. These legal issues involve criminal responsibility and compensation. In some cases, the determination of causation are even more controversial, for example, adverse reactions caused by overdose of vaccination, requesting health care workers to vaccinate when the recipient is of dangerous constitution, mixing and matching vaccines, etc., and how should these causations be properly determined? Each of these questions are discussed and answered in this article.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、強制施打疫苗措施的正當性
參、醫療上因果關係的認定
肆、疫苗施打與不良反應的刑法評價,(歸責性)
(以下刊載本期)
伍、疫苗施打與受害補償的因果關係(關聯性)
陸、特殊情況的刑事究責
柒、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
張麗卿,疫苗施打不良反應的責任歸屬(下),月旦法學雜誌,第 336 期,107-118 頁,2023年05月。
返回功能列