法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
論人工智慧時代著作權法上結合著作與其他著作類型之概念及利用(The Concept and Uses of Compound Works and Other Types of Works under Copyright Act in the Era of Artificial Intelligence)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 蔡明誠
出版日期: 2024.01
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 344 期/6-21 頁
頁  數: 16 點閱次數: 849
下載點數: 64 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 蔡明誠
關 鍵 詞: 結合著作合理使用著作權限制生成式人工智慧人工智慧法
中文摘要: 人工智慧時代來臨,影響層面甚為廣泛,在人工智慧法中著作權問題,可以討論者亦為數不少。因現行著作權法尚未明定結合著作,本文欲藉比較法研究,探討結合著作之概念,以及其與其他著作類型之關係,並建議於著作權法明定結合著作。且面對生成式人工智慧運用巨量資料之學習而輔助或生成之創作及利用之新型態,著作權法亦可考量是否區分學習階段與利用階段,而明定利用受著作權保護之資料之合法界限,以利解決有關人工智慧時代衍生之著作權問題。
英文關鍵詞: Compound WorksFair UseLimitation of CopyrightGenerative Artificial IntelligenceAI Law
英文摘要: With the advent of the era of artificial intelligence (AI), the impact is wide-ranging, especially in the field of artificial intelligence law, there are many copyright-related issues worth discussing. As the current Copyright Act has not clearly defined compound works, this article aims to apply comparative law method to explore the concept of compound works and their relationship with other types of works. This article suggests that the Copyright Act should explicitly specify compound works. Moreover, in light of new form of creation and utilization assisted or generated by Generative AI (AI Generated Content) learning from vast amounts of data, the Copyright Act may also consider distinguishing between the AI learning stage and utilization stage and specifying the legal boundaries for the use of copyrighted materials. These adjustments would help solve copyright issues arising from the era of AI.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、從著作種類看結合著作與其他著作類型之區分
參、從實務見解論結合著作之概念
肆、比較法觀察結合著作之概念與利用
伍、人工智慧時代運用人工智慧之人機結合創作之著作類型及其利用
陸、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
蔡明誠,論人工智慧時代著作權法上結合著作與其他著作類型之概念及利用,月旦法學雜誌,第 344 期,6-21 頁,2024年01月。
返回功能列