法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
從晚近司法裁判實務檢視警察職權行使法有關臨檢規定之合理性(Examining the Provisions on Inspections in the Police Power Exercise Act: From the View of Judicial Judgment Practice)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 李東穎
出版日期: 2023.12
刊登出處: 台灣/公法研究第 7 期/129-152 頁
頁  數: 16 點閱次數: 115
下載點數: 64 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 李東穎
關 鍵 詞: 警察職權行使法酒駕攔檢具體危險抽象危險警察法上之標準措施
中文摘要: 警察職權行使法施行迄今已逾 20 週年。然而,在警察設置攔檢站執行酒駕稽查勤務之情形,警察職權行使法有關臨檢權限之規定應如何適用,在實務上仍迭生爭議。本文除將扼要地呈現行政法院就此所表示之意見外,亦將指出問題的根源在於警察職權行使法第 6 條至第 8 條在規範內容上的不協調。作為在現行規範體系下的問題解決之道,本文以為應將警察權力行使的控制重點,提前至攔檢站設置決定的合法性審查。然為正本清源,仍應思考警察職權行使法第 8 條在規範體例上的合理性,就此,本文亦將提出修法建議。
英文關鍵詞: Police Power Exercise Actdrunk drivingspecific dangerabstract dangerstandard measures under police law
英文摘要: It has been 20 years since the enforcement of the Police Power Exercise Act. However, when the police set up checkpoints to perform drunk driving inspection services, there are frequent disputes in practice as to how the provisions of the Police Power Exercise Act regarding the power of inspection should be applied. In addition to briefly presenting the opinions expressed by the Administrative Court on this matter, this article will also point out that the root of the problem lies in the incoherence in the normative content of Articles 6 to 8 of the Police Power Exercise Act. As a solution to the problem under the current normative system, this article believes that the focus of control over the exercise of police power should be advanced to the review of the legality of the decision to set up checkpoints. However, in order to rectify the source, we should still consider the rationality of the normative style of Article 8 of Police Power Exercise Act. In this regard, this article will also put forward suggestions for amending the law.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、從典型警察任務觀察警職法臨檢措施之特色
一、警察任務之典型特徵
二、臨檢措施在警職法中之具體化
三、警察臨檢權限之競合
參、行政法院相關裁判見解
一、管制站設置之合法性審查
二、查證身分權限之競合與法律之適用
肆、從學理觀點檢視行政法院裁判見解
一、管制站設置之合法性審查
二、警職法第 6 條至第 8 條間之調和適用
伍、警職法有關臨檢規範之修正建議
陸、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
李東穎,從晚近司法裁判實務檢視警察職權行使法有關臨檢規定之合理性,公法研究,第 7 期,129-152 頁,2023年12月。
返回功能列